Israel-Hamas Conflict is a Smokescreen Towards a Broader War (With Iran)
Atomic weapons were abolished but not war itself. Only by maintaining the strain of continual tension and conflict, could the ruling parties enforce…absolute power” - 1984
The successful infiltration of Israel's border and airspace by Hamas operatives on October 7 has left many people bewildered and prompted even more to label this as a monumental failure on the part of Israel's intelligence agency, Mossad. Indeed, it seems improbable that a second-rate guerilla outfit like Hamas could successfully initiate, plan and execute a multi-pronged operation of that sophistication with virtually no resistance from Israel's all-detecting and ultra-pervasive intelligence apparatus.
Mossad sits prominently among the most advanced intelligence networks on the planet, and the notion of Israel being caught completely "off guard" by Hamas' incursion simply defies logic. It is reminiscent in scale and nature to the series of suspicious intelligence "blunders" which preceded Pearl Harbour and 9/11 in the US, much more so considering that Hamas is literally in Israel's own backyard. This is the elephant in the room, and all things considered, we're led to the inevitable question: were Hamas belligerents deliberately "allowed" to pour into Israel, and was this intelligence “failure" in fact a success?
Even proponents of the bought-and-paid-for mainstream media have hinted at this possibility, acknowledging that Israeli forces effectively stood down and turned a blind eye to intel alerting them of a surge in activity near the Gaza border by Hamas militants shortly before the incursion. The Israeli Defense Force eschewed the intel, the incursion ensued, and the rest, as they say, is history. Civilian casualties continue to mount without any signs of abating, and the conflict is poised to draw in more players into its orbit the longer it unfolds.
And so we come full circle: Was Hamas deliberately permitted access into Israel by the upper echelons of Israel’s Defense Force? Most probably. But to what end? What does Israel stand to gain by rolling the red carpet to Hamas intransigents whose single greatest mandate is the destruction of Israel as a state? Is it a flashpoint engineered to eventually incite war with Iran? Is it yet another plot to mire the United States in a never-ending war to the detriment of the U.S economy and Pax Americana? It could be one of these, both, or worse yet - even more. Time will tell. So far, it has been a war of competing narratives.
Either way, war is a racket and a convenient artifice. The globalist class has much to gain by covertly encouraging hostility between Israel and any class of radical Islam insurgents in the Middle Eastern region as a pretext for stoking a U.S/Israel war with Iran. Globalist power brokers have been looking to subdue Iran since the 1979 Iranian revolution which deposed the western-allied shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in favour of an Islamic regime which has since played hardball and railed against the rules of the so-called international community.
Why is Iran consistently portrayed as the bane of Middle Eastern peace and a global pariah that poses an existential “nuclear threat” to the entire world? Why are its economic and military capacities consistently overstated? Before Russia’s military operation in Ukraine, Iran was the most-sanctioned regime in the world, and that is a telltale sign of a marked nation. Why is it incessantly floated as the world’s boogeyman?
Ironically, Israel is the Middle East’s real nuclear threat, but that’s a story for another time, the show must go on. Nevertheless, all these are symptoms of a much larger ploy to subdue Iran’s sovereignty, and the current Israeli-Hamas confrontation just might be the golden goose for setting America and Iran on a collision course which has the inherent potential to reshape the incumbent post-world war 2 global order and railroad the world towards the globalists' envisaged "New World Order".
The idea would be to lure Iran into open warfare with Israel, and there is a multiplicity of ways by which such a feat could be achieved. So far, the war has been a lopsided affair with the Israeli Defense Force possessing the upper hand insofar as military firepower is concerned. But this asymmetric position could be flipped on its head in a moment's time, should Hezbollah or some other Islamic jihadist militant group feel inclined to join Hamas on the battlefield - and this just might be the endgame. The display of brinkmanship between Hamas and Israel will eventually broaden to include Iran, and the United States.
Both Israel and Hamas are pawns on a much larger chessboard of international power play. Internationalist power brokers will try to exploit the crisis to provide fraudulent justification for a military confrontation in which the United States and Israel would seek to annihilate Iran with the intention to overthrow its regime and complete its assimilation into the “global community”, which is euphemism for one world government.
This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a conspiracy fact. It is the tendency of globalists to conjure crisis as a vehicle for consolidating power and reshaping the world in their own image. Washington-based globalist think-tanks have openly voiced their desire to subdue Iran and trample its sovereignty underfoot. Even to the extent of publishing a roadmap for overcoming Iran detailing how coordinated attempts can be devised to lay waste to an Iranian regime which has been a thorn in the side of globalist schemes for 44 years.
Indeed, for this same reason, efforts to promote regime change in Iran might be intended by the U.S. government as deliberate provocations to try to goad the Iranians into an excessive response that might then justify an American invasion.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor in the Carter administration, extensively detailed how a false flag event may serve as the casus belli for an all-out war with Iran.
More than just national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski was co-founder of the elusive Trilateral Commission alongside David Rockefeller, who was himself an ardent advocate of the dissolution of sovereign nation states in favour of a collectivist society at the behest of an all-encompassing one world government. More than just an innocuous hypothesis, perhaps he was simply voicing what he knew to be the plan.
Rumours are already swirling in media airspace of possible Iranian involvement in the form of military and financial aid to Hamas. Washington’s hawks initially acknowledged having no evidence of Iran's complicity in the ongoing combat, perhaps as a sleight of hand to convince the public of America's supposed “disinterest” in war with Iran, only to escalate the rhetoric and ramp up the accusations steadily as the war progresses. Whether or not Hamas or Hezbollah actually are Iranian-backed proxies matters little, because we live in a world where perception supersedes reality and facts, much like Saddam Hussein and the non-existent "Weapons of Mass Destruction" which precipitated the invasion Iraq and the usurping of its regime. There is nothing new under the sun, globalists use the same basic principles to consolidate power. Crisis is their mainstay and Hegelian Dialectic is the name of the game - lather, rinse, repeat.
The Grand 'Grand Chessboard'
With America already mired in the Russia-Ukraine war, pursuing open and direct military confrontation with Iran simultaneously would only deepen its quagmire and would eventually have the effect of diminishing its already floundering sway over the international order and its primacy as the world's foremost superpower. Though unlikely for multiple reasons, an invasion of Taiwan by China at this stage would only compound America's woes as Washington would have to engage in multiple, unsustainable and ever-widening conquests. More than being militarily and economically exhausting, an openly anti-Iranian policy will likely push Iran further into the embrace of America's sworn adversaries, Russia and China, with other players quickly following suit as they seek to insulate their interests from America’s intrusive claws and vie for a seat at the table of the emerging global order.
The outcome would be catastrophic both for the US and the post-world war II liberal world order as China and Russia have openly and consistently voiced their voracious appetite for a multipolar world order in which America is deposed as the world's kingmaker and power is distributed among a growing number of regional players. Even if (rather when) the United States is able to finally subvert Iran, such a victory would be short-lived as its aftermath would mark the beginning of the end for America Incorporated. Not least because America's antagonism of Iran would coincide with its current and record-high hostility towards China and Russia, eventually culminating in the much-dreaded anti-American axis envisaged by Zbigniew Brzezinski in his magnum opus, "The Grand Chessboard", in which he posited:
"Potentially, the most dangerous scenario would be a grand coalition of China, Russia, and perhaps Iran, an "antihegemonic" coalition united not by ideology but by complementary grievances. It would be reminiscent in scale and scope of the challenge once posed by the Sino-Soviet bloc, though this time China would likely be the leader and Russia the follower.
However, a coalition allying Russia with both China and Iran can develop only if the United States is shortsighted enough to antagonize China and Iran simultaneously”
Undoubtedly, this grand coalition scenario is already taking shape.
Rewriting the Rules: The International Economic System
World order is founded upon economic order, and the economy is what renders a superpower, a superpower. With record debt bordering on $34 trillion, and the dollar beset by inflation owing to years of ultra-loose monetary policy, the only remaining backbone of America's economic superiority is the dollar's petrodollar status, which has sustained its reserve currency privilege. With Iran, Saudi Arabia and the UAE having recently been extended an invitation into the BRICS bloc, America's economy would be next on the chopping block. Among them, China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Iran and the UAE account for 40% of the world's oil production and 30% of total consumption. Under the pretext of shielding themselves from the swings of dollar instability, they could simply decide to drop the dollar as the medium of exchange for oil altogether, opting instead to trade in their own respective currencies. The BRICS have been openly calling for the reformation of the global monetary system in the form of a new reserve currency for well over a decade.
“All options should be explored, with an open mind, to achieve this. We support the reform and improvement of the international monetary system, with a broad-based international reserve currency system providing stability and certainty. We welcome the discussion about the role of the SDR in the existing international monetary system including the composition of SDR's basket of currencies.”
Accomplishing this feat necessarily demands the fall of king dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and the process is well in motion, the US dollar is in free-fall. While this is unlikely in the near-term, it it is only a matter of time, and war against Iran by the United States would only accelerate the process.
Vladimir Putin on dollar destruction, 2019
A precedent of how this may unfold can be found in the oil crisis of the 1970s, when OPEC's Arabian proponents placed an oil embargo on the U.S and other Western nations in retaliation to America’s support of Israel during the Yom Kippur War, inspiring a shortage in oil supply and a commensurate surge oil prices in the embargoed countries. In fact, those events epitomize today’s unfolding situation, and history is a prescient teacher.
"In October of 1973 Egypt and Syria (supported by a number of Arab nations) launched an attack against Israel which came to be known as the Yom-Kippur War. At the time the U.S had rising oil consumption, falling production and increasing imports of oil, mostly from OPEC countries. The decision by the U.S. to intervene in the Yom-Kippur War on the side of Israel had a disastrous effect for the US economy. Early in the war, the U.S decided to supply Israel with arms, this angered the Arab delegation of OPEC which responded with an embargo of oil sales to the U.S, Canada, the UK, Japan and the Netherlands".
At the time, the U.S economy was still relatively sound, having only gone off the gold standard a few years prior and better positioned to absorb the shock and awe of surging gasoline prices. With an American economy standing on its last economic leg, the same scenario today may prove to be lethal. The convergence of record-high inflation and an oil shock would accelerate the dollar’s devaluation and de-dollarization as players seek to offload dollar-denominated assets in favour of more stable commodities and foreign reserves. The dollar’s share of global foreign reserves has been eroding steadily overtime, how much more in the face of a perceived imminent dollar annihilation? Effectively, we're witnessing the soft destruction of the current global order, the end of American exceptionalism to usher in an age referred to by globalists as the "New World Order", and it is all by design. By playing the role of global policeman, America’s show of “strength” will become its achilles heel, and catalyze its own demise.
It is unlikely that the Israel-Hamas dust will settle any time soon. The globalist hydra will seek to milk this crisis for everything it’s worth, even to the extent of protracting it by purely artificial means.
“Global crises that crush existing orders and overturn long-held norms, especially extended, large-scale wars, can pave the way for new systems, structures, and values to emerge and take hold. Without such devastation to existing systems and practices, leaders and populations are generally resistant to major changes and to giving up some of their sovereignty to new organizations or rules.”
-The Brookings Institution, Sometimes the World Needs a Crisis, 2017
Whichever direction the pendulum swings, one thing's certain: when wars and rumours of wars start to escalate with ever-increasing intensity, time is almost up. It does not represent the end in itself, but all these are the beginning of sorrows.
And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. 7For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. 8All these are the beginning of sorrows.
-Matthew 24:6-8
In the meantime, fix your eyes on the Lord Jesus, and watch unto prayer.